Dunno I'd say malice. But I think it goes well beyond these structural points u note. NYT has deep issues with Hillzhttps://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/772512995335245825 …
.@joshtpm I don't see it with NYT as a whole, though you could point to particular stories certainly. They've had /1
-
-
good stories on Trump U, debt, race discrimination in housing, sexism, vote rigging comments. But /2
-
Problem is Times' (and MSM's) lack of focus on Trump sleaze factor: money in politics, using politics to protect from business dealings /3
-
And part of that is the lack of a news peg. If he's a sleaze what is there to report? But bigger problem is HRC coverage which /4
-
has tended to make more of CF/State access and special deals than seems to be warranted based on the evidence. But /5
-
as the newspaper of record, the Times has a very tough job threading the needle, and when it stumbles everyone pounces. /6
-
This has been worsened by internet/social media deadlines, which led to awful Healy lede on Trump Mexico/immigration story /end
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
read that story and tell me u don't get impression that It could have been written by trump campaign
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rick look at their front page story on foundation from yesterday. They neglected to mentionpic.twitter.com/lYZXOed92f
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.