7. On other hand, on issues of Trump's pay to play/access/potential governance style, there seems to be much less attention/evenhandedness
-
16. (b) There are rich stories from Trump's past, like his history of racial discrimination in housing
17. (c) Because Trump is so outrageous, the media seems less interested in the access/governing story which is so important
-
-
18. (d) Thanks to FOIA disclosures, there's always a new news peg for Clinton access stories but not for Trump, which requires digging
-
19. (e) Clinton campaign and HRC have longstanding antagonistic relationship with press, which just encourages aggressiveness on both sides
-
20. Clinton would actually help herself by doing regular press conferences and availabilities, which would lower temperature w/journalists
-
21. But watching Clinton campaign/allies tangling w/ ournalists like
@kenvogel just exacerbates animosity/feelings of mistreatment by both -
22. And in the end Clinton gets more disproportionate stories on sale of access /influence when Trump seems to be much bigger offender.~FIN~
-
well said.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And possibly general audience lack of interest in complex stories?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.