@dannyhensel why would Rs vote at all? Norms? I expect a 5 year stonewall.
Yes, but it could come before in lame duckhttps://twitter.com/dannyhensel/status/766306140271640576 …
-
-
-
Their argument hasn’t been Garland bad, it’s been “next prez should nominate.” They mostly like Garland
-
sure but that's arbitrary. They're supposed to hear Garland now. If 1 year ok, why not 4? Intellectual consistency?
-
well, the whole thing is bs, but the one consistent thing they’ve said is “next president should confirm.”
-
agreed. I'm just dubious they'll even fulfill that promise/obligation.
-
senate Rs may be consistently terrible, but at least they’re consistent.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.