I make this point specifically about campaign finance in my book, #PlutocratsUnitedhttps://www.amazon.com/Plutocrats-United-Campaign-Distortion-Elections/dp/0300212453?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0 …
Yes it is much easier to amend Constitution by changing #SCOTUS than by passing amendmenthttps://twitter.com/nate_cohn/status/754430934972194817 …
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@PupperJ@Nate_Cohn we'd have to turn the hill blue -
Tweet unavailable
-
Thank you
@PupperJ for the correction!@rickhasen@Nate_Cohn -
I preferred chemistry to civics as a kid...kinda still do ;-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Easier but unconstitutional.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
movement to amend doubles as pressure on Justices to reverse Citizens United. Amenders can have their cake and eat it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have a hard time honestly seeing an amendment ever going through these days. Just seems pretty much impossible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it may be hard to prove what was intended but it's easy to feel what was intended everything changes, adapts or dies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@howappealing@Nate_Cohn Changing Citizens United will B fun to se how corporations like NYT&WaPo Co R able o function.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Nate_Cohn. They might also abide by stare decisis.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.