it shouldn't. She said plenty that could justify recusal in future cases (applying std Scalia used in pledge case)
Do you think one's views on the propriety of her statements turns on one's ideology?https://twitter.com/jadler1969/status/752285489068138496 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jadler1969 You'd think after 2000, justices would avoid jumping into electoral politics. She may have to hear a case on it. -
, you'd agree that Ginsburg's now obligated to recuse from any Clinton-Trump cases, right? cc
@jadler1969
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Suspicion: this - willingness to be in the limelight - can be traced back to Scalia's embrace of extra-judicial speeches?
-
his speeches forced him to recuse in a high profile case. I think he learned where to draw line. RBG hasn't.
-
Maybe. There were others he might have recused but didn't. Anyhow, interesting how some justices enjoy celeb status
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.