Ok arguments over. First: lawyers for DOJ & LDF were excellent. TX SG dodged a few q's but also very good. #voterID
-
-
Replying to @5thCircAppeals
Judge Jones most active questioner. Softballs for TXSG and very hostile to DOJ & LDF (esp LDF).
#voterID1 reply 3 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @5thCircAppeals
Lots of talk about "limiting principle" - TXSG claiming *all* election laws vulnerable under Ps' approach.
#voterID1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @5thCircAppeals
CJ Stewart grilled TXSG (who was dodging a bit); J. Haynes also seemed sympathetic to Ps; also Graves & Costa.
#voterID2 replies 4 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @5thCircAppeals
J. Elrod very concerned about remedy; enjoining/striking law too broad for as-applied challenge.
#voterID1 reply 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @5thCircAppeals
Jones & Elrod (maybe Southwick?) most sympathetic to TXSG. 7 judges asked no questions.
#voterID3 replies 3 retweets 1 like
Replying to @5thCircAppeals
so what's your best guess on the breakdown?
8:40 AM - 24 May 2016
from Los Angeles, CA
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.