I've now posted my full analysis of 485-page NC voting rights decision. Appeal could succeed, but not certain: http://electionlawblog.org/?p=82224 /1
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
It is a careful, erudite, and controversial opinion by a thoughtful judge, but one predisposed to be skeptical of plaintiffs' claims /2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
and a judge predisposed to accept NC's reasons for passing its restrictive voting laws, mostly ignoring the partisan context /3
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
the tenuousness of the state's interest in the law is the law's greatest weakness, and best grounds for 4th circuit appeal /4
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
but, appellate courts will have to follow judge's factual findings, which are very bad for plaintiffs, unless findings clearly erroneous /5
1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes
quite possible a D-leaning 4th circuit panel reverses NC voting decision at least in part, then #SCOTUS could divide 4-4. What a mess! /6
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.