But even if the state/Palmer is right and the number disenfranchised is "only" half that amount, still very troubling. (2/2)
I don't know. The trial judge made the factual finding of 300,000, which was not overturned on appeal. But (1/2)https://twitter.com/TheRepLawyer/status/720373286173954048 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen WHere is 2/2 of 2? -
@rickhasen Not our question. Yes or no do you believe 300000 number is correct? -
@TheRepLawyer In 1/2 I started with "I don't know." Did you not see that? -
@rickhasen Okay, but why endorse ("must read") & tweet an article that you "don't know" if "facts" are true but ignore actual news & facts?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.