@rickhasen @zackroth Not to mention, isn't "affects outcomes" far less of an issue than disenfrachises, robs voters of rights?
They ask different question abt whether it affects outcomes.No question some WI voters were unfairly disenfranchisedhttps://twitter.com/zackroth/status/717806731099766784 …
-
-
-
@TheBradBlog@rickhasen right & their question isn't even "affects outcomes," it's "affects turnout." It's both unanswerable & misses point. -
@zackroth@rickhasen Other issue I think also misses point: "How many" affected. If it's YOU that loses your right to vote, that's too many! -
@TheBradBlog@rickhasen well I think how many affected IS important for media to investigate. But turnout tells you very little about that. -
@zackroth@rickhasen Agree needed for media investigation. But numbers -- "lots!" or "just a few 100 or 1000" -- miss point, IMO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@journalsentinel fair enough but most readers see headline suggesting ID law may or may not be good policy. Jury now in on that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.