Right, exactly.https://twitter.com/rickhasen/status/714828035598323712 …
.@RMFifthCircuit This is why I expect vote on Garland when clear Rs will lose presidency and could lose Senate.
-
-
.
@rickhasen Agreed. That is the only rational strategy for Rs here. No reason to confirm while *any* chance of victory.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@RMFifthCircuit Doubt lame duck consideration either: base gives Rs credit only for intransigence, even in defeat. Thus play will -
@rickhasen@RMFifthCircuit be to try to filibuster Clinton choice. Even if D's eliminate Court filibuster, R's will have resisted to end. -
@yeselson@rickhasen filibuster to what end? -
@RMFifthCircuit@rickhasen The base wants revanchist rage and resistance--the "end" isn't to achieve the best outcome it can get. It's to -
@RMFifthCircuit@rickhasen "achieve" implacable opposition for its own sake. What do you think the endless votes to repeal the ACA have -
@yeselson@rickhasen that has no down side. Downside risk here is immense to conservative interests (which I share) -
@RMFifthCircuit@rickhasen Well, then you better get McConnell to push back against the revanchists. They don't measure opportunity costs -
@RMFifthCircuit@rickhasen the way you do. And, in fact, as David Frum suggested years ago, the R's have paid a great price for rearguard - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@RMFifthCircuit The logic of holding seat for a Conservative is permanent. They could block/filibuster until they hold Sen=PotusThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.