See my @slate piece, 4th paragraph, quoting CJ Roberts: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/09/voting_rights_act_sections_2_and_5_texas_defends_voter_id_laws.html …https://twitter.com/WilliamBaude/status/639458814295736320 …
Section 2 is "appropriate" and "available" to stop discriminatory voting laws from going into effect, is nationwide
-
-
@rickhasen No, *injunctions* are "available" but only in "appropriate" cases, which could well only be limited by constitutional concerns. -
@WilliamBaude@rickhasen Another bait and switch is (a) promise of preliminary injunctions followed by (b) all the Purcell stays last year
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.