Rick HasenVerified account

@rickhasen @katherinemiller @mckaycoppinshttps://twitter.com/rumpfshaker/status/630560982075506688 …

@rickhasen @katherinemiller @mckaycoppins ... versus paying Breitbart for favorable coverage, which would be both illegal and unethical.

@rickhasen @katherinemiller @mckaycoppins -- While it maybe sleazy, I'm not sure if it'd be illegal of Trump had invested in Breitbart ...

@rickhasen @katherinemiller uh- yes. For sure.

@rickhasen @GayPatriot @katherinemiller @mckaycoppins If ABC & Stephanopoulos who gave Hilary favorable coverage and $ could be a story.

@rickhasen @GayPatriot @katherinemiller @mckaycoppins George Stephanopoulos with ABC gives Hilary $ and there's no story there folks.

@rickhasen @GayPatriot @katherinemiller Trump: "Campaign laws, schampaign laws. I paid for classy coverage."

@rickhasen @NoahCRothman All of this Breitbart/Trump stuff is based on rumor - nothing substantive. Guess that's Buzzfeed MO?

@rickhasen @GayPatriot He buys politicians. No doubt he's trying to buy others, including paid Humpers in social media.

@rickhasen @NoahCRothman @katherinemiller @mckaycoppins not right or ethical just seems par for the course.

@rickhasen @NoahCRothman @katherinemiller @mckaycoppins I'm sure the Clintons millions had NO influence. None. Zippo. zilch.

@rickhasen @NoahCRothman If the money was unreported to the FEC then yes. Otherwise not likely.

@rickhasen @NoahCRothman @katherinemiller @mckaycoppins I do wonder how different it is from Clintons giving millions to @nytimes

@rickhasen @NoahCRothman @katherinemiller @mckaycoppins bull!