My claim is:when a state burdens voters, it shd have legitimate, provable reason for doing so http://harvardlawreview.org/2014/01/race-or-party-how-courts-should-think-about-republican-efforts-to-make-it-harder-to-vote-in-north-carolina-and-elsewhere/ …https://twitter.com/MichaelMcGough3/status/621368343677808640 …
-
@rickhasen@MichaelMcGough3 if effect is flat, then could say having it is "burden" on others -those whose turnout drops.
@jadler1969 @MichaelMcGough3 No--it burdens different groups of voters each election day
-
-
@rickhasen@MichaelMcGough3 if change reduces turnout of group A, isnt that a "burden" in your framework? -
@jadler1969@MichaelMcGough3 Yes, but not only burden: if Group A in this election and Group B in another, still a burden. -
@rickhasen@MichaelMcGough3 then early voting is a "burden" insofar as some studies have found it reduces turnout by some groups. -
Tweet unavailable
-
@elliotmitchell@rickhasen@MichaelMcGough3 see, e.g. Larocca &Klemanski (2011), Burden, et al., AJPS (2014) 2/2 -
Tweet unavailable
-
@elliotmitchell@rickhasen@MichaelMcGough3 my broader point is that we need more robust defn of "burden"; voting never "cost-free" - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.