@rickhasen Yes. Loss for textualism and for Chevron -- so a double loss for Scalia. (Consolation: revival of Roberts' Arlington dissent)
I read King to undercut Chevron and promote purposive statutory interpretation: http://electionlawblog.org/?p=73760 https://twitter.com/bmaz/status/614076872889008129 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen Agreed on both. Some additional thoughts in response to your post here: https://ziffblog.wordpress.com/2015/06/25/the-chief-justices-brand-of-textualism/ … cc:@jadler1969@AnthonyMKreisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen As my old Con Law Professor would say, "Wait for the second opinion to decide what the first one means."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.