.@JoshMBlackman @nicholas_bagley @jadler1969 @JessBravin FWIW, I believe Presidents should talk MORE about pending cases before #SCOTUS.
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin do you feel same about govt attys and lower courts?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jadler1969
.
@jadler1969@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin No, but I do feel the same about Members of Congress, head of co-equal branches2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin prosecutors and habeas appeals?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jadler1969
.
@jadler1969@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin I limit to elected officials and#SCOTUS2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin in all types of cases?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jadler1969
.
@jadler1969@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin Idea that President speaking on pending case would "bully"#SCOTUS is ridiculous.3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin Hypothesis: those less concerned tend to want more deferential judicial review1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jadler1969
@jadler1969@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin across all cases?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@JoshMBlackman@nicholas_bagley@JessBravin I was making broad generalization1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jadler1969 @JoshMBlackman @nicholas_bagley @JessBravin could be. Don't know.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.