#ELB: Why the Court Should Leave the Choice of One Person One Vote Rules to the States: In… http://goo.gl/fb/DgDZhb
-
@rickhasen Conservatives are limited to the constitutional text in interpreting a right (1 person 1 vote) that is nowhere in the text?
@AdamCharnes where did I say limited to the constitutional text?
-
-
@rickhasen you called it ironic that cons made an argument "not tied to the actual text of the Constitution."Not ironic bc no text to tie to -
.
@AdamCharnes so the appropriate conservative response is to argue there's no one person, one vote principle, not a stricter one. -
@rickhasen Disagree. Justice could respect stare decisis & not overrule even if thought wrong.Then must interpret what 1 person 1 vote means -
@AdamCharnes why must they and not leave it to the states given that it is an essentially contested concept? -
@rickhasen Well isn't that a merits issue which requires interpreting the principle non-textually? I don't have an opinion on the merits.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.