@rickhasen At the risk of wading out of my depth, isn't this new case a Shaw-like attack on application of RV rule vs attack on rule itself?
#ELB: What the Supreme Court Said in the 1960s About Complying with One Person, One Vote… http://goo.gl/fb/0NFBxC
-
-
-
@HHHElections not sure I see the difference -
@rickhasen I read it as "RV is OK except when it's used to mask racial preferences" - but again, haven't swum this stroke in years ... -
.
@HHHElections Race and shaw get no mention in plaintiffs' jurisdictional statement. It may be motivation behind suit, but not legal claim -
@rickhasen I'll go back to the shallow end :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen This scheme was court-drawn and then adopted by state. It's not the same state choice as HI choosing representational pop.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen and case cited itself says holding could change if circumstances do; seems circumstances changed pretty dramiticallyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen Could be a recognition of far more non-citizens in '15 than '65; 4.5% foreign-born to 12% today; plus fewer become citizensThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen Weird. On this reading, it sounds like the Court there basically kicked the issue aside for "political question"-like reasons.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.