If 1311 said "exchange established by a pony," 1321 would require the gov't to create same exchange. RT@jessewegman @rickhasen @jadler1969
-
-
Replying to @espinsegall
@espinsegall@jessewegman@rickhasen but it would not have been established by a pony;1311(d) is requirement, not definition3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jadler1969
To obtain a subsidy you must be "qualified" which has zero to do whether feds or states run the xchange.
@jadler1969@jessewegman@rickhasen1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @espinsegall
.
@espinsegall@jadler1969@jessewegman I think there is no question a Justice could write textualist opinion upholding federal exchanges 1/21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
.@espinsegall @jadler1969 @jessewegman but I doubt whether use of textualism will actually drive case outcome, as opposed to ideology 2/2
0 replies
1 retweet
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.