@rickhasen There's another, apolitical reason: It makes him look like he's already made up his mind in every case. No air of impartiality.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@DemFromCT How useful are "questions"? Are they really necessary for the court to learn anything relevant they can't get?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@DemFromCT politics is stupid. Oh he's on SCOTUS? Now who's being naive? It's a political attack. Most of those r senseless.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@DemFromCT The logical extension of your argument is that there should be no oral arguments at all. If so, just say that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@DemFromCT Or? That would be, "and"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen how can you arbitrate with out some fact finding?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen I most certainly have not. If I wanted to question that, I’d focus on having written 1 really significant or memorable opinion in -
@rickhasen 24 years on the Court. Or his ideology.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.