Foley partner defends 'unorthodox' petition in #SCOTUS disciplinary action http://at.law.com/DEyPCb READ the response: http://at.law.com/GbGKGp
.@Legal_Times @RMFifthCircuit Wow- Paul Clement brought in to defend the Foley partner who submitted the patent cert petition in gibberish
-
-
@rickhasen@Legal_Times What's startling is that the defense is literally - "my client insisted, so I signed it." -
.
@RMFifthCircuit@Legal_Times The backup defense is: I did not know#SCOTUS rules prohibited author attribution to non-lawyer -
@rickhasen@Legal_Times Right. But courts are not always very nice when lawyers say they don't know court rules. -
@RMFifthCircuit@rickhasen@Legal_Times Argument re.#SCOTUS acceptance of similar amicus briefs on behalf of Schindler in past is not bad.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@Legal_Times@RMFifthCircuit go big or go home I guessThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.