@Greg651 @rickhasen @JoshMBlackman I empathize. I think she was exaggerating her inebriation for comic effect.
-
@JoshMBlackman@Greg651@rickhasen Talking about specific cases, pending or possibly coming to#SCOTUS in future, is much bigger deal.
.@DavidLat @JoshMBlackman @Greg651 Agreed, but does anyone think her vote (or Scalia's) vote would be any different if mouths kept shut?
-
-
@rickhasen@DavidLat@Greg651 What matters in the cannons of ethics it the appearance of impropriety. Tipping your hand destroys it. -
.
@JoshMBlackman@DavidLat@Greg651 I thought the canons don't apply to SCOTUS justices (maybe they should) -
@rickhasen@DavidLat@Greg651 Alas, the Justices are not bound by any cannons of ethics... -
@JoshMBlackman@rickhasen@Greg651 Not bound by canons. Or cannons. But I'd find a cannon pointed at me to be very persuasive authority!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@DavidLat@JoshMBlackman@Greg651 Some might think so, given recusal motions filed against Scalia. -
FWIW I didn't think Scalia needed to recuse in Newdow, now Kagan in NFIB.... RT
@jadler1969@rickhasen@DavidLat@JoshMBlackman@Greg651
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.