Read @CitizenCohn on latest evidence that anti-ACA lawsuit is based on fabricated legislative history: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/29/obamacare-lawsuit_n_6570970.html?1422548137 …
-
@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Both of us have dealt at some length with that argument
.@ThePlumLineGS @CitizenCohn I'm speaking as someone not steeped in the ACA case but who regularly teaches a course on Legislation/Interpr.
-
-
@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Again, we have both dealt at some length with that argument -
.
@ThePlumLineGS@CitizenCohn Right-I think it is important to have a statutory interpretation perspective not colored by the ACA case -
@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Please go back and look at how the challengers are using Nelson's (supposed) views -
@ThePlumLineGS@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Serious response is to look for contemporaneous evidence of what he wanted/did. -
@jadler1969@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Jon, this is a rigged game. You're pretending "contemporaneous evidence" challengers cite is above board -
@ThePlumLineGS@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Nothing rigged about insisting on meaningful counter. -
@jadler1969@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Insisting on meaningful counter to fake contemporaneous evidence is, by definition, a rigged game.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@CitizenCohn You might want to go back and look at how the challengers use Nelson's viewsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is not what we are saying and writing. We are saying challengers story is demonstrably false. RT
@rickhasen@ThePlumLineGS@CitizenCohnThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@ThePlumLineGS@CitizenCohn The reason I say King is replay of UARGvEPA is b/c both turn on interpretive method.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.