Read @CitizenCohn on latest evidence that anti-ACA lawsuit is based on fabricated legislative history: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/29/obamacare-lawsuit_n_6570970.html?1422548137 …
.@ThePlumLineGS @CitizenCohn statements of legislative drafters well after the fact (like Gruber's statements) are entitled to little weight
-
-
@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Both of us have dealt at some length with that argument -
.
@ThePlumLineGS@CitizenCohn I'm speaking as someone not steeped in the ACA case but who regularly teaches a course on Legislation/Interpr. -
@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Again, we have both dealt at some length with that argument -
.
@ThePlumLineGS@CitizenCohn Right-I think it is important to have a statutory interpretation perspective not colored by the ACA case -
@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Please go back and look at how the challengers are using Nelson's (supposed) views -
@ThePlumLineGS@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Serious response is to look for contemporaneous evidence of what he wanted/did. -
@jadler1969@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Jon, this is a rigged game. You're pretending "contemporaneous evidence" challengers cite is above board -
@ThePlumLineGS@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Nothing rigged about insisting on meaningful counter. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@ThePlumLineGS@CitizenCohn When you say little, that should be effectively zero. -
Okay, let me be crystal clear: Both sides of King debate have engaged in disingen legs intent args
@rickhasen@ThePlumLineGS@CitizenCohn -
@bmaz@rickhasen@CitizenCohn Not good enough. One side is responding to the other side's disingenuousness with all it has at its disposal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.