GRANTED: http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/011615zr_f2q3.pdf … #SSMpic.twitter.com/CZ8YMgdghu
.@MikeSacksEsq #scotus framing of 1st question in same sex marriage case is quite odd
-
-
@rickhasen About states' rights rather than individual rights? Kind of like the doctor-centric right in Roe? -
@MikeSacksEsq@rickhasen I was thinking the same thing. -
@sonjarwest@rickhasen Theory as to why they negotiated that language? -
@MikeSacksEsq@sonjarwest@rickhasen If I were a conservative justice, that's how I'd write it. -
@bradheath@sonjarwest@rickhasen But to what end? I still don't see that wording forcing an anti-#SSM ruling. -
@rickhasen@MikeSacksEsq@bradheath Also leaves DC / federal gov't out of it? -
@sonjarwest@rickhasen@MikeSacksEsq@bradheath More mundane reason: to logistically manage/limit 4 sets of briefs. 2/4 just sought recog.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.