Anti-speech activists like @mjbeckel @davelevinthal @Publici like to conceal that they want to overturn NAACP v. Alabama.
-
.
@kerpen I have seen little evidence of unconstitutional harassment. Economic boycotts are not harassment. they are 1st Amendment protected
.@kerpen It is all laid out in paper. I won't debate this further on Twitter. Just wanted to call out ridiculous NAACP v. Alabama analogy
-
-
Way more "ridiculous" to pretend the Democratic amendment to gut the
#1A would leave NAACP v. Alabama intact.@rickhasen -
@kerpen why are you changing the subject? -
@rickhasen That is the subject. -
Obviously.
@rickhasen
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@kerpen if you think you are facing harassment like that faced by Blacks in South during time of NAACP v. Alabama you are delusional.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.