Anti-speech activists like @mjbeckel @davelevinthal @Publici like to conceal that they want to overturn NAACP v. Alabama.
-
They have updated the post to include my full statement.
@rickhasen@Publici@mjbeckel@davelevinthal
.@kerpen @mjbeckel @davelevinthal That doesn't make them want to overturn NAACP v. Alabama. See my "Chill Out" paper http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1948313 …
-
-
@rickhasen If you don't think vicious anti-ALEC and anti-Koch smear cmapaigns have chilled donations to disclosed entities you are wrong. -
.
@kerpen I have seen little evidence of unconstitutional harassment. Economic boycotts are not harassment. they are 1st Amendment protected -
.
@kerpen It is all laid out in paper. I won't debate this further on Twitter. Just wanted to call out ridiculous NAACP v. Alabama analogy -
Way more "ridiculous" to pretend the Democratic amendment to gut the
#1A would leave NAACP v. Alabama intact.@rickhasen -
@kerpen why are you changing the subject? -
@rickhasen That is the subject. -
Obviously.
@rickhasen
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.