Glad to have @rickhasen oped @thenlj on need for #scotus transparency when ct changes rulings post-pub. @openscotus http://at.law.com/VD3SXh
-
@Tonymauro@rickhasen@TheNLJ@OpenSCOTUS are there any rules re: changing opinions later? What happens to lower Ct decisions quoting it?
-
-
There are no rules about cert and no rules about DIG's. Rule of 4 not formal. RT
@rickhasen@kkaplan@Tonymauro@TheNLJ@OpenSCOTUS -
@espinsegall@Tonymauro so the finality referred to here is kinda 'subject to change at any point without notice'pic.twitter.com/8u03sQyvtp
-
Almost everything about our highest Court is "subject to change at any moment." RT
@kkaplan@Tonymauro@rickhasen -
@espinsegall@kkaplan@Tonymauro@rickhasen you know congress could easily make SCOTUS hearings televised -
@jimmy_z63@espinsegall@Tonymauro@rickhasen that's going to be a separation of powers issue, I'd imagine. -
@kkaplan@espinsegall@Tonymauro@rickhasen in fact I wish they would be reeled in a bit. Its powers go far beyond what founders envisioned -
My understanding is no Supreme Court Justice in the world has life tenure except for ours. RT
@jimmy_z63@kkaplan@Tonymauro@rickhasen -
@espinsegall@kkaplan@Tonymauro@rickhasen also want to remove direct election of Senators and increase house by 100. Is it Christmas yet? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.