'The Supreme Court has no excuse for being so opaque about its practices.' @rickhasen on SCOTUS secrets: http://at.law.com/VD3SXh
-
The cert votes, unless someone dissents. RT
@Maggyw519:@rickhasen OMG..I had no idea Scotus votes were not public..that's awful!!!!!”
-
-
@rickhasen@espinsegall@Maggyw519 Would be fun if a lone public dissenter tossed collegiality out and named names. But will never happen. -
@djsziff@rickhasen@espinsegall@Maggyw519 clerks won't even talk decades later. They once fired porters, worried they'd spill conf details -
@kkaplan@rickhasen@espinsegall@Maggyw519 Except for that Lazarus book. That was good. -
I think the Lazarus book is the most realistic account of the Court that we have. RT
@djsziff@kkaplan@rickhasen@Maggyw519
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.