.@rickhasen Can you say more on why you think Kobach's version of events is more likely to be accepted if there's no factfinding by Court?
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen But maybe letter + statute is enough to get Taylor off ballot2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DKElections
@DKElections@rickhasen "facts" on offer here do seem fairly confined, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joshtpm
@joshtpm@DKElections not sure what you mean by "confined." Q is whether gov't official gave assurances letter was ok.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen mean that number of facts, open questions fairly tight, not far-flung as in many other cases1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@joshtpm KS Supreme Court itself not set up to do its own factfinding.
1:21 PM - 11 Sep 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.