Great @TheNLJ interview with Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Worth reading to the end. http://m.nationallawjournal.com/module/alm/app/nlj.do#!/article/1701862687 …
.@JoshMBlackman @adamwinkler I think it was criticism like asking if liberal #SCOTUS Justices were savvy or suckers http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/07/are_the_liberals_on_the_supreme_court_savvy_or_suckers.html …
-
-
@rickhasen@adamwinkler Rick, I thought of your column when I read that. It was almost like she was replying to this line of criticism -
.
@JoshMBlackman@rickhasen She is right abt corruption &elected judges.Bopp-driven end to restraints &post-CU world hits jud elecns hardest -
@NormOrnstein@rickhasen As a Justice, who reviews judgments from elected judges, does this impact her decisions?http://joshblackman.com/blog/2014/08/22/rbg-on-republicans-and-campaign-finance-law/ … -
.
@JoshMBlackman@rickhasen 2. Judges facing mega$ against them raise their $ from those who practice in front of them.Inherently corrupting -
@NormOrnstein@rickhasen If the elected judges are inherently corrupt, should that impact how the Supreme Court views those judgments? -
.
@JoshMBlackman@rickhasen They are not inherently corrupt. The process is inherently corrupting. That is different. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.