@rickhasen @kerpen @EricKleefeld That's right. McD shoulda asked for a new election - otherwise he must show he got majority of lawful votes
.@JohnPittmanHey @kerpen @EricKleefeld Not talking voters who also voted in Dem primary. Even if those illegal (likely), not enough votes
-
-
@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld IF he is actually making that claim, it's more a political appeal to the ExecCmte; It'll never fly in court -
.
@JohnPittmanHey@kerpen@EricKleefeld he is definitely making that claim. That's why he relies on polling of Democrats. cc:@samrhall -
@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld@samrhall All that polling data is completely useless in an election contest. It'll be ignored by the court -
.
@JohnPittmanHey@kerpen@EricKleefeld@samrhall I think we are basically on the same page about Mcdaniel's chances. Very very low.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld McDaniel will lose the claim that Democrats who sat out the June 3rd primary couldn't vote in June 24th. -
.
@JohnPittmanHey@kerpen@EricKleefeld Then he loses his challenge. -
@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld Well, it depends on how the proof plays out. But if he can't climb to 7800 illegal votes, he's toast.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld I'm only speaking of crossovers from June 3 to June 24. That prohibition is enforceable. -
.
@JohnPittmanHey@kerpen@EricKleefeld Agree, but not enough at stake to get a new election, much less have loser declared winner!#MSSEN -
@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld I agree that there is no way that McDaniel will succeed in having himself declared outright winner. No way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.