Totals of identified illegal votes in challenge: 1473 D-primary/R-runoff double-voters 881 invalid absentee 59 invalid affidavit Total: 2413
@kerpen @EricKleefeld @JohnPittmanHey could well be different if remedy sought is not new election but change in result
-
-
@rickhasen Good point; I agree.@EricKleefeld@JohnPittmanHey -
@kerpen@rickhasen@EricKleefeld But note that McD does plead in the alternative that the election must be voided, so that prolly saves it. -
@JohnPittmanHey@kerpen@EricKleefeld not in line with what he and his lawyers said at press conference today -
@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld Yeah, but it's in the pleading.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld That's right. McD shoulda asked for a new election - otherwise he must show he got majority of lawful votes -
.
@JohnPittmanHey is there legal wiggle room to change challenge to ask for a new election down the road@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld -
@willstauff@rickhasen@kerpen@EricKleefeld McDaniel already plead in the alternative for the committee to void the election. -
@JohnPittmanHey@rickhasen@willstauff@kerpen@EricKleefeld Obviously Rick Hasen is biased. His argument on laches is hilarious. Good one! -
@DostoevskyShade@rickhasen@willstauff@kerpen@EricKleefeld lack of enforceable criminal sanction is no bar to contestant challenging vote -
.
@JohnPittmanHey@willstauff@kerpen@EricKleefeld Here is context for the laches argument in election litigation: http://electionlawblog.org/?p=27985 -
@rickhasen@willstauff@kerpen@EricKleefeld McDaniel & most contestants aren't asking 4 a change in the law, just that it wasn't followed. -
.
@JohnPittmanHey@kerpen@EricKleefeld Disagree. there was accepted interpretation of law which McDaniel could have challenged preelection - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.