If you don't believe judges should be originalist/textualist, it's hard to justify them being life-tenured & unelected.
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank
.
@baseballcrank@jadler1969 the incorrect premise of your question is that originalism and textualism are meaningfully constraining2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@jadler1969 My point is, if you believe judges are never constrained by law, why shouldn't they instead be responsive to voters?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
.
@baseballcrank@jadler1969 agreed, but don't think that textualists or originalists are any more constrained than other judges2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@jadler1969 I think your agreement with abolishing life tenure & unelected judges is not widespread among anti-textualists.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@baseballcrank @jadler1969 I don't support life tenure (I want term limits) but I'm more ambivalent on judicial elections.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.