@rickhasen @AppellateDaily Sorry, disagree. Respect is earned. SCALIALAW is an egregious violation of constitution, puts democracy at risk.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@AppellateDaily I'd normally agree, but for the Roberts Court, it's entirely appropriate.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen Hard to make a case for propriety when Ginnie Thomas is running a politcal consulting business. That ship has sailed.@SCOTUSblogThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@AppellateDaily@SCOTUSblog I’d cite 1st Amend, but SCourt would rule 5-4 against in ‘narrow’ cases where gov branch is 2+ PeopleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@AppellateDaily@SCOTUSblog Perfectly fine for Federal judge to tell SCourt to STFU in a blog/in public. I think there's a law.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@SCOTUSblog@AppellateDaily sigh. Just want to say it to four or five of them...#STFUThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This past student of Judge Kopf agrees MT
@rickhasen: Not Okay to Publicly Say “STFU” to SCOTUS if You're a Fed Judge http://electionlawblog.org/?p=63070 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@SCOTUSblog@AppellateDaily Wilson's pointing and shouting "You lie!" (twice) at Obama is comparing two bombs to a grenade.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@AppellateDaily@SCOTUSblog I respectfully and vehemently disagree. If I had life tenure if might use a more colorful abbrev!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@SCOTUSblog@AppellateDaily actually, First Amendment and lifetime appointment, so sounds like he can say what he wants.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@SCOTUSblog respect is earned not inherent - meant for the judge -and- SCOTUSThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@SCOTUSblog It's about protocol, and pretending otherwise undermines your entire point. As does final parenthetical.#cluelessThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@SCOTUSblog@AppellateDaily "this is about respect for the rule of law." No it isn't. Man's life dedicated to rule of law.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@SCOTUSblog@AppellateDaily Fuck that. What possible significance could the inclusion or exclusion of 'f' in 'stfu' have?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.