Claims of "illegality" "voter fraud" spreading among sites sympathetic to McDaniel but no proof offered yet #MSSEN
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Here are 3 examples on 1 page. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BrEwVkCCIAAY9uy.png:large …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuckeyeTexan
.
@BuckeyeTexan This has not been verified yet as anything other than a clerical mistake yet. Documents will have to be reviewed by court.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
.
@BuckeyeTexan and so far this is the ONLY page I've seen anyone offer to show fraud in#MSSEN.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen 3 on 1 page in 1 precinct. What are the odds those are isolated cases? Let's see what they have.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BuckeyeTexan
.
@BuckeyeTexan I couldn't agree more. "Let's see what they have." They need to come forward with something.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Now you have 3 examples. Can't say "no proof." No attorney would reveal evidence before appropriate time.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BuckeyeTexan
@BuckeyeTexan OK. I can say "virtually" no proof because 1. needs to be offered for inspection and 2. only 3 possible cases.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen So by that logic, they could reveal all, but if uninspected, it'd mean nothing to you. So why show you?5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BuckeyeTexan I'm not the one to convince. You will need to have evidence to convince a judge.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.