Claims of "illegality" "voter fraud" spreading among sites sympathetic to McDaniel but no proof offered yet #MSSEN
.@BuckeyeTexan This has not been verified yet as anything other than a clerical mistake yet. Documents will have to be reviewed by court.
-
-
.
@BuckeyeTexan and so far this is the ONLY page I've seen anyone offer to show fraud in#MSSEN. -
@rickhasen 3 on 1 page in 1 precinct. What are the odds those are isolated cases? Let's see what they have. -
.
@BuckeyeTexan I couldn't agree more. "Let's see what they have." They need to come forward with something. -
@rickhasen Now you have 3 examples. Can't say "no proof." No attorney would reveal evidence before appropriate time. -
@BuckeyeTexan OK. I can say "virtually" no proof because 1. needs to be offered for inspection and 2. only 3 possible cases. -
@rickhasen So by that logic, they could reveal all, but if uninspected, it'd mean nothing to you. So why show you? -
@BuckeyeTexan I'm not the one to convince. You will need to have evidence to convince a judge.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen How is it a clerical mistake? Pollbooks were swapped for runoff. Different writing between 6/3 & 6/24. -
@BuckeyeTexan people signing/writing on the wrong line. It happens ALL the time. -
@rickhasen 1 poll worker signs wrong line 3X & coincidentally next to 3 of 4 who voted in D primary?#eyeroll -
@BuckeyeTexan again, I agree with you. Let's see the evidence. I'm not saying it is not there. I'm saying let's see it. -
@rickhasen Then we agree. Let's see what they've got - after it's inspected.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.