To answer a question just posted on @SCOTUSblog, NLRB spox told me months ago that board could retroactively & quickly OK earlier decisions
.@johngramlich @SCOTUSblog is that really necessary under de facto officer doctrine?
-
-
@rickhasen@SCOTUSblog I'll leave it to the lawyers to answer that one! -
.
@johngramlich@SCOTUSblog I believe in Buckley v. Valeo that decisions of improperly appted FEC were valid under de facto officer doctrine
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@johngramlich@SCOTUSblog NLRB may think reaffirming is the easier path; that's what it did in 2010 after New Process SteelThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.