@rickhasen They got it out in less than two months. I'd say that's pretty speedy, especially for an important case, even though unanimous.
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@Scotus@AppellateDaily Not quite two months from cellphone arguments to decision: "so long"? Hardly. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@OrinKerr suggested maybe it was unanimous precisely bc they had to get it out (relatively) fast: http://m.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/06/25/the-significance-of-riley/ …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen I will be reading it tonight but maybe it was unanimous because it had to satisfy all 9 Justices & required a few compromises.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@Scotus@AppellateDaily Split outcomes at first, based on different kinds of cellphones? Then second thoughts, consolidation?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.