As I said before, if Cochran takes down McD, is gonna be like putting the nitro & dynamite & plastique of GOP crazy together in one can.
.@joshtpm claim of fraud clearly would be that those with history of Democratic voting ineligible to vote in primary.http://electionlawblog.org/?p=62649
-
-
@rickhasen Indeed, but seems logically/legally ridiculous. Fallacious claim as to predictive of intent.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen plenty to work with in crazy town. but imagine any court would toss that on first look, if that's all they were going on. -
.
@joshtpm key point is definitive ruling on meaning of statute before election which makes challenge less likely. http://electionlawblog.org/?p=62694 -
@rickhasen less likely or less viable? - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@joshtpm mystifying law: seems to me you can either have an open primary or closed primary but this is just nuts? am I missing? -
@saramayeux@rickhasen Not really contradiction. Really just saying you cant vote in BOTH parties races in one cycle. -
@joshtpm@rickhasen I see. I guess I feel if that's rule you want, have a closed primary. but, I also think strategic use of vote is A-OK +
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@joshtpm like what party wants political system based on idea you can never legitimately change parties?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.