.@espinsegall @CBSAndrew J. Posner was cavalier with evidence in original Crawford case. See my @Wapo oped from then: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/18/AR2007091801572.html …
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
Maybe, but the world was very different back then and your article cites more generalities than evidence (part1) RT
@rickhasen@CBSAndrew1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
.
@espinsegall evidence: "Indiana conceded there have been no cases in state history of voter impersonation that ID law would have prevented"3 replies 11 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
Fair enough.But there was little or no evidence of voter disenfranchisement either. I'm on your side but 2006 was a while ago. RT
@rickhasen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
.
@espinsegall Posner says he saw no evidence law intended to disenfranchise. But lack of evidence law served antifraud purpose shows motive2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen
Posner is displaying the human side of judging in all its vulnerability. I think that humility is awesome. RT
@rickhasen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @espinsegall
.
@espinsegall But Posner's actual judging is the opposite of humility. It is cavalier and not particularly thoughtful.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rickhasen
Well that is quite a claim about his career. In any event, I am not judging his judging but his decision to talk about the case.
@rickhasen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @rickhasen
Gotta go but on that I heartily disagree. His books on judging are amazing examples of judicial self-reflection. RT
@rickhasen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
.@espinsegall There are ways to talk about judging which show introspection and respect.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.