Judge Posner should just stop talking about his terrible mistake in Crawford. The more he says, the worse he sounds: http://electionlawblog.org/?p=62722
-
-
Posner is displaying the human side of judging in all its vulnerability. I think that humility is awesome. RT
@rickhasen -
.
@espinsegall But Posner's actual judging is the opposite of humility. It is cavalier and not particularly thoughtful. -
Well that is quite a claim about his career. In any event, I am not judging his judging but his decision to talk about the case.
@rickhasen -
.
@espinsegall he's cavalier in that too. -
Gotta go but on that I heartily disagree. His books on judging are amazing examples of judicial self-reflection. RT
@rickhasen -
.
@espinsegall There are ways to talk about judging which show introspection and respect.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What he says is he may have been wrong depending on the evidence which he doesn't remember that well. What is wrong with that? RT
@rickhasen -
.
@espinsegall the whole case was about whether the evidence was sufficient and evidence of fraud is same now as it was then -
But evidence of disenfranchisement was different too, very different. RT
@rickhasen -
.
@espinsegall no matter when state has no evidence to support interests under anything but lowest level of review inappropriate for voting -
I'm not going to argue with you about voter ID laws (obviously).Just saying I wish more judges would discuss how hard judging is.
@rickhasen
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.