In other words, the unsealed Walker docs are arguments from the losing side of the case. Might change on appeal, but that's the status.
.@CCharlesAllen @AriMelber Think "Whitewater." The truth eventually doesn't matter when there is a plausible mudslinging to do
-
-
@rickhasen@CCharlesAllen@AriMelber Judge has already ruled that claims not plausible, though. http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2014/06/the-latest-scott-walker-smear-debunked.php …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@AriMelber I think the convincible middle (AKA people who are inclined to change their mind bc of mudslinging) is smaller than 92 -
@rickhasen@AriMelber What makes mud sticky thes days is proof (e.g. 47% video), and on that the email w Rove could be a major issue for him -
@rickhasen@AriMelber The ppl in ideological middle r suspicious of both sides - words not enuf, need to show them what you're telling them
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@CCharlesAllen@AriMelber it defines Walker for a general election, no matter what happens in a primary.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.