Classy move by 7th Circuit: new oral argument in big FISA case after no audio first time http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/usca7_daoud_argument_order.pdf … h/t @MikeScarcella
-
-
@rickhasen Appearances matter (cf. campaign finance law) -
.
@adamliptak I agree appearances matter. But I would have preferred court order regretting error and taking steps so it won't repeat. -
@rickhasen This will make a repeat much less likely than a memo would have -
.
@adamliptak True. And at least the 7th Circuit has publicly owned up to its mistake. Cf: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/25/us/final-word-on-us-law-isnt-supreme-court-keeps-editing.html?_r=0 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen@adamliptak And what does it mean that "case is not being reheard." A bit confused. -
.
@espinsegall@adamliptak This is what I mean it is bizarre. It is not meant to change minds. A show trial (or show argument). -
.
@rickhasen@espinsegall for the advocates: those esprit d'escalier points can now be made
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@crescat why jinx? what did you write?
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.