Attacked from left and right today. https://twitter.com/zackroth/status/467025085090758657 … https://twitter.com/PaulHJossey/status/466963724289716224 … My work is done.
.@zackroth I've responded to the charge of "false equivalence" many times. Here's my most extensive response: http://electionlawblog.org/?p=31719
-
-
.
@rickhasen Dems xpanding vote & GOP limiting it. Both motivated by partisanship but only 1 is antidemocratic. That's all I was noting. 2/2 -
.
@zackroth Dems are just lucky then that they are on the right side of a moral issue, but it doesn't mean they are less self-interested -
.
@rickhasen Seems important to keep that clear in explaining what's going on. Doesnt mean we're saying Dems are better people. Anyway, thnx. -
.
@zackroth sure reads like you are saying Democrats are better people. -
.
@rickhasen I think xpanding voting is good thing. So Dems are on the right side on this, democracy-wise, even if led there by partisanship. -
.
@rickhasen But key point is there's a moral difference btwn xpanding & limiting voting, whoever's doing it & for whatever motive. OK done!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@rickhasen ok but that's on a different issue: Dems making hyperbolic claims. Your comment from Weds implied a moral equivalence btwn 1/2 -
.
@zackroth I believe many D legislators push expansion of electorate for self-interested reasons.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen ok but that's on a different issue: Dems making hyperbolic claims. Your comment from Weds implied a moral equivalence btwn 1/2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.