@rickhasen U often doubt PhotoID #s. But it takes just 1 person losing a fundamental right for SCOTUS to find unconst, no?
-
-
@rickhasen But Crawford had NO ONE shown to have lost rights. Am I wrong about that?! -
@TheBradBlog no, you are wrong that the court does not treat every burden on the right to vote as fundamental and subject to strict scrutiny -
@rickhasen So if plaintiff has LOST right to vote due to a law (& no fault of their own), thats not enuf to find it unconst? - End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.