Recap: In #McCutcheon, CJ Roberts acts politically naive but that's part of his rhetoric, not reality http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/04/symposium-does-the-chief-justice-not-understand-politics-or-does-he-understand-it-all-too-well/ … @SCOTUSblog
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Less restrictive alternative under strict scrutiny turns on practical availability,not political feasibility.Doctrine not naivete2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamCharnes
.
@AdamCharnes yeah, but CJ Roberts purports NOT to be applying strict scrutiny in#McCutcheon.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen But wouldn't the same principle governing less restrictive alt. apply a fortiori to the "closely drawn" standard Roberts applied?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @AdamCharnes
.@AdamCharnes Not the way the Court had applied "exacting scrutiny" to contribution limits in the past:e.g., Shrink Missouri, 2000, VERY lax
9:11 PM - 10 Apr 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.