Which journo will write the story about how Adegbile nomination went to vote and then defeat? Reid's fault? Obama admin? cc: @jonralston
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen Does the 52 opposed include Reid's procedural vote? If so then seems the story is the one who flipped with no heads up.Coons?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @FedcourtJunkie
@FedcourtJunkie@rickhasen Sure, but how the hell did this get on the floor for a vote w/o the whip locked down? Reid+WH are exactly the Q's1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @bmaz
.
@bmaz@FedcourtJunkie NYT now reports things changed at last minute with whip count, according to WH http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/06/us/politics/senate-rejects-obama-nominee-linked-to-abu-jamal-case.html?ref=politics&_r=0 …#Adegbile1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
.
@bmaz@FedcourtJunkie nyt reports that Sen. Reid warned of vote failure but WH pressed ahead anyway http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/06/us/politics/senate-rejects-obama-nominee-linked-to-abu-jamal-case.html?ref=politics&_r=0 … cc: @jonraslton2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@FedcourtJunkie So, what was the WH's deal? Thought magic would make it all okay, or what?? Jeebus.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
.@bmaz @FedcourtJunkie I think WH thought they'd pressure some Ds to cave to avoid this kind of embarrassment. Bad calculus.
-
-
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@FedcourtJunkie Yes, that's pretty lame calculus. Math is hard I guess.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.