And don't miss @MichaelMcGough3 on @JeffreyToobin on Justice Thomas http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-clarence-thomas-supreme-court-silence-20140221,0,1703665.story …
-
-
Well, with all due respect, you should read the piece I wrote on Thomas and Aff. Action. RT
@rickhasen@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin -
.
@espinsegall@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin Will do. But "disgrace" is different from "vehement disagreement." -
I use the word "disgrace" b/c Thomas has staked out strong textualism/originalism stance but uses them only when convenient. RT
@rickhasen
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I argue there that Thomas ignores text and history in his aff. action decisions and badly misquotes F. Douglas. RT
@rickhasen@JoshMBlackmanThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen@espinsegall@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin two parts of the job, oral arguments & opinion. He fails at at least 1 of them. -
@brianros1@rickhasen@espinsegall@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin By that standard, a number of weak justices,Brennan,Douglas,Blackmun -
@rhj1954@rickhasen@espinsegall@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin Not sure how you figure. He doesn’t speak at all in oral arguments. It’s a -
@rhj1954@rickhasen@espinsegall@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin failure to do his job in my view.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.