For the record, "judging Thomas by his opinions," he is is a disgrace: see http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2013/03/72511.html … @rickhasen @MichaelMcGough3 @JeffreyToobin
-
-
-
.
@espinsegall@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin I strongly disagree with your claim Justice Thomas is a disgrace when judged by his opinions. -
Well, with all due respect, you should read the piece I wrote on Thomas and Aff. Action. RT
@rickhasen@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin -
.
@espinsegall@MichaelMcGough3@JeffreyToobin Will do. But "disgrace" is different from "vehement disagreement." -
I use the word "disgrace" b/c Thomas has staked out strong textualism/originalism stance but uses them only when convenient. RT
@rickhasen
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.