This move @rickhasen does NOT impact Supreme Court nominations
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen What does that mean in terms of political process? He says he will do just that today. Say he does. Then what would you -
@yeselson it will be precedent later on for Supreme Court nomination -
@rickhasen That's fair and, to some extent, likely true. But the specifics of that maneuvering--and thus the result of it--will depend upon
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@rickhasen There's never been a filibuster of a SC nominee, has there? I'm not sure that line has been crossed, yet.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen esp if the there is a Democratic President or Ginsberg if there is a Republican President.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@rickhasen Who will Jeb Bush easily get confirmed to replace them?#Dems should've done it YEARS ago, so they're part of the problem.#p2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.